Significantly, in his Commentary on the Mishnah (loc. cit.), the Rambam does not mention the word "even." Similarly, his grandson, Rav Yitzchak HaNagid, writes in a responsum that the inclusion of this word in some manuscripts of the Mishneh Torah was a scribal error. when this is due to their natural moistness. These entities are referred to as substances that increase heat.
There are substances which, if food is covered with them to preserve its heat, will [accomplish that objective alone]. They will not contribute to the cooking process, but will merely prevent [the food] from cooling - e.g., grape skins, unprocessed fabrics, grass, when these are dry, garments, produce,6Rashi (loc. cit.) explains that this refers to grains - e.g., kernels of wheat, barley, and the like. Larger produce would not be an effective insulating agent. pigeon feathers, thin chips from the combing of flax, carpenters' sawdust, pelts, and the shearings of wool. These entities are referred to as substances which preserve heat.7The Rambam describes the laws pertaining to these substances in Halachot three and four.
The Sages, however, enacted a decree forbidding covering food with substances that raise its temperature before nightfall,8The Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 257:1) states that if one violates this prohibition and covers food with these substances, it is forbidden to partake of the food until Saturday night. The Ramah, however, permits the food to be eaten on the Sabbath if one covered it without knowing of the prohibition. lest the pot boil on the Sabbath and it be necessary to uncover it until its boiling ceases. If one would then cover it again on the Sabbath, one would be covering food with a substance that increases its heat on the Sabbath, and this is forbidden.9In his Commentary on the Mishnah (Shabbat 4:1), the Rambam explains that covering the food with these substances does not violate the prohibition against cooking. The prohibition against cooking involves only cooking with fire and heat that results from fire (see Chapter 9, Halachah 2), but not cooking substances with other sources of heat.
The Rabbis, nevertheless, forbade such an act, because it resembles cooking. Furthermore, as a safeguard to insure that this prohibition is not violated, the Sages also forbade covering food before the commencement of the Sabbath with substances that increase its heat.
The Rambam's interpretation is based on Rabbenu Yitzchak Alfasi's version of Shabbat 34a,b. The Ra'avad, Rashi, Tosafot, and many others follow a different version of that passage, which explains that the reason it was forbidden to cover food with these substances is a safeguard against a person covering food with a mixture of ash and coals. (See the following halachah.) This view is accepted by the Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 257:1).
Accordingly, it is permitted to cover food with substances that increase its temperature beyn hash'mashot,10The time between sunset and the appearance of three stars. The status of this time is a question of doubt: is it considered part of the day or the night? (See Chapter 5, Halachah 4.)
The Maggid Mishneh finds this law one of the more difficult aspects of the Rambam's explanation of this halachah, for there is no other instance where the laws that apply beyn hash'mashot are more lenient than those that apply before sunset. since at that time most pots have already boiled, and they [have cooled, so that] they cease boiling. Since they have already ceased boiling, it is unlikely that they will boil again.
(It must be noted that according to the Rambam's interpretation, a mixture of ash and coals is considered somewhat analogous to substances that do not raise the temperature of food. The Maggid Mishneh considers this one of the major difficulties with the Rambam's interpretation. Rav Kapach justifies the Rambam's position with a reference to Beitzah 8a, which appears to indicate that such a mixture is not hot.) [As a safeguard against this,12In his Commentary on the Mishnah (Shabbat 4:1), the Rambam notes that this explanation appears to contradict one of the principles of Rabbinic law. Our Sages taught (Shabbat 11b), אין גוזרין גזירה לגזירה, "We do not enact a decree to safeguard the observance of a decree that is itself a safeguard." The prohibition against covering the food with a mixture of ash and coals is itself a Rabbinic decree enacted lest one stir the coals. To uphold this decree, the Sages forbade covering food even with substances that will not increase its temperature.
In resolution of this difficulty, the Rambam implies that the principle mentioned above applies only when the two decrees are enacted in different times. When the two decrees are enacted simultaneously, there is no such difficulty (see Beitzah 3a). Since the Rabbis appreciated that the first element of the decree depends on the second, they enacted two safeguards at the same time. the Sages] forbade covering food with any substance13In this instance, the Mishnah Berurah 257:8 states that if a person covered a food with these substances on the Sabbath, he may partake of them on the Sabbath. on the Sabbath, even when it will not raise the food's temperature.
When hot food that was covered before the Sabbath becomes uncovered16The use of the passive voice by the Rambam (and by the Mishnah, Shabbat 4:2, his source) should not be interpreted to mean that this leniency is granted only when the food is uncovered accidentally. On the contrary, a person may recover the food even if he intentionally uncovered it, for example, he uncovered it to serve a portion (Shulchan Aruch HaRav 257:8 and the Mishnah Berurah 257:25). on the Sabbath,17If, however, the food became uncovered before the Sabbath, it is forbidden to cover it again on the Sabbath (Shulchan Aruch HaRav 257:8 and the Mishnah Berurah 257:25). it may be covered again, since one is not increasing its temperature. It is permitted to change the covering of food on the Sabbath - e.g., one may replace clothing with pigeon feathers or replace pigeon feathers with clothing.18I.e., regardless of whether the second covering is more or less effective than the first, it is permitted to exchange them. Note the Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chayim 257:4), which states that a more effective covering may be placed on food only when it has been thoroughly cooked. If the food is still in need of further cooking, this is forbidden.
The [Sages] forbade only covering [food] with other substances on the Sabbath. It is, however, permissible to place one vessel on another vessel so that they remain hot.24Note the Shulchan Aruch (loc. cit.:7-8), which questions whether this leniency applies when the lower pot is cooking on a fire or not. One opinion maintains that if the food in the upper pot has been thoroughly cooked, there is no prohibition in placing it on a pot that is cooking on the fire. Since only a Rabbinic prohibition is involved and this does not resemble the normal manner of cooking, there is no reason for stringency. Another opinion maintains that placing food on such a pot is like placing it on the fire itself and is forbidden. The Shulchan Aruch favors the more lenient opinion, as do the later authorities. In contrast, we may not place a vessel containing a cold substance on a hot vessel on the Sabbath, for by doing so one introduces heat to it.25The Shulchan Aruch (loc cit.:6) explains when this prohibition applies: If the food can become hot enough to scald a child's hand, it may not be left on the other vessel. It is permissible, however, to place [cold food on a hot pot] before the Sabbath commences.26See the Beit Yosef (loc. cit. 258) which explains that one is not permitted to leave food that is covered with insulating materials on a fire even if this is done before the Sabbath. It is not considered analogous to covering food with a substance that raises its temperature.27The Shulchan Aruch (loc. cit. 257:8) which differentiates between this law and the other laws mentioned in this chapter, explaining that the prohibition against covering food with substances that insulate it and preserve its temperature applies only when the substances cover the food entirely without leaving a portion of the food exposed.
הלכות שבת פרק ד
א) יש דברים שאם טמן בהן התבשיל, הוא מתחמם ומוסיפין בבישולו כעין האש -- כגון גפת, וזבל, ומלח, וסיד, וחול, או זוגין ומוכין ועשבים בזמן ששלושתן לחין מחמת עצמן; ודברים אלו, נקראין דבר המוסיף. ויש דברים שאם טמן בהן התבשיל, יישאר בחמימותו בלבד, ואינן מוסיפין לו בישול, אלא מונעין אותו מלהצטנן -- כגון זוגין ומוכין ועשבים יבשים, וכסות, ופירות, וכנפי יונה, ונעורת הפשתן, ונסורת חרשים, ושלחין, וגיזי צמר; ודברים אלו, נקראין דבר שאינו מוסיף.
ב) מן הדין היה, שטומנין בדבר המוסיף מבעוד יום, ויישאר התבשיל טמון בשבת, שהרי משהין על גבי האש בשבת. אבל אסרו חכמים להטמין בדבר המוסיף, מבעוד יום: גזירה, שמא תרתח הקדירה בשבת, ויצטרך לגלותה עד שתנוח הרתיחה, ויחזור ויכסה בשבת -- ונמצא טומן בדבר המוסיף בשבת, שהוא אסור. לפיכך מותר להטמין בדבר המוסיף, בין השמשות -- שסתם קדירות בין השמשות, כבר רתחו ונחו מבעבוען, וכיון שנחו, שוב אינן רותחין.
ג) וכן מן הדין היה, לטמון התבשיל בדבר שאינו מוסיף, בשבת עצמה; אבל אסרו חכמים דבר זה -- גזירה, שמא יטמין ברמץ ויהיה בו ניצוצות של אש, ונמצא חותה בגחלים; לפיכך אסרו להטמין דבר חם בשבת, ואפילו בדבר שאינו מוסיף.
ד) ספק חשיכה ספק לא חשיכה, מותר לטמון את דבר חם; ומותר לטמון את דבר הצונן בשבת, בדבר שאינו מוסיף, שלא יצטנן ביותר, או כדי שתפוג צינתו. חמין שטמנן מערב שבת, ונתגלו בשבת -- מותר לכסותן, שהרי אינו מוסיף; ומותר להחליף הכיסוי בשבת. כיצד, נוטל כסות, ומניח כנפי יונה; או נוטל כנפי יונה, ומניח הכסות.
ה) פינה התבשיל או המים החמין, מכלי לכלי אחר -- מותר להטמין הכלי האחר בשבת בדבר שאינו מוסיף, כמו הדבר הצונן: שלא אסרו להטמין בשבת, אלא דבר חם שהוא בכלי ראשון שנתבשל בו; אבל אם פינהו, מותר.
ו) מניחין מיחם על גבי מיחם בשבת, וקדירה על גבי קדירה, וקדירה על גבי מיחם, ומיחם על גבי קדירה; וטח פיהם בבצק: לא בשביל שייחמו, אלא בשביל שיעמדו על חומם -- שלא אסרו אלא להטמין בשבת; אבל להניח כלי חם על גבי כלי חם, כדי שיהיו עומדין בחמימותן -- מותר. אבל אין מניחין כלי שיש בו דבר צונן, על גבי כלי חם, בשבת -- שהרי מוליד בו חום בשבת; ואם הניחו, מבערב -- מותר, ואינו כטומן בדבר מוסיף.




